April 9, 2026

4 thoughts on “Under the Banner of Misattribution

  1. Thanks for writing this! Awesome work. Some of my family members already have questions about the series. Of course, informed persons know it’s fiction, but Krakauer might not. When the fictional nature of the book was pointed out, Krakauer is said to have quoted Quinn, that the Church sometimes hides things. Quinn, as sincere as he may have been, sometimes viewed accurate history as JS engaging in homosexuality, or being gay, or somewhat gay, or encouraging homosexuality, or etc. (as you probably know, sleeping in the grave and rising to kiss and embrace his brothers in the resurrection, for example, turns into sleeping with his brothers in another way, and so on).
    I disagreed with the part about the new owners of the Salt Lake Tribune “changing its tone,” until I reread and noticed the “somewhat.”

  2. Thank you for this in-depth comparison. It seems to be representative of the method Mr. Krakauer employs when writing about the Church and its history.

  3. For the Journal of Discourses quote, did you go to the deciphered shorthand that Mr. Watt used in taking notes to ensure this was not one of Mr. Watt’s published writings where Mr. Watt either left somethings out of or added to the speakers words or in some cases, made up a whole talk. For reference to my question, please see the podcast of “In Brigham’s own words” in LDS Perspectives, episode 22. Thanks.

  4. It is not included in the current collection at https://catalog.churchofjesuschrist.org/record?id=5df3b7da-d0a5-437b-8268-7dde8a87c76e&view=browse&lang=eng

    However, as I said in the post, the article in the Salt Lake Tribune was obviously a parody of what actually happened during the conference. It’s hard to imagine that any discrepancies between what was said and what was published in the Journal of Discourses would be any closer to the newspaper version.

Comments are closed.