April 9, 2026

8 thoughts on “Rejoicing and Mourning: Context for Selling the Kirtland Temple

  1. Can I make a correction? Maybe I’m wrong here, but the way I understood it the majority of the Saints did not follow Brigham Young, but Joseph Strang. I learned this from an Ensign article. Strang also inherited the original name of the church (probably because of their size?) and we had to change it (not sure why the 2013 D&C edition makes it seem like we didn’t have to–it was originally a capitol D with no hyphen; I’m chalking that up to ignorance). Eventually that church ended up being what outsiders to their faith would call a bait and switch–with no intention of carrying on the restoration as people understood it. After Missouri was cleared out in the Civil War the Hendrickites and Josephites resettled it. Together there were still more Stangites, Hendrickites, and Josephites than Latter-day Saints combined which was unsettling because Joseph Smith said (and this is in that Teachings of the Living Prophets Manual) that the majority of the Saints would make the right decision (I wish that manual was in front of me so I could remember the exact wording).

    Other misconceptions circulating around the internet dealing with the temple: First people are balking at Saints who say they got the temple back. That’s true because Latter-day Saints did the best they could in purchasing land during that time despite huge hardship and from what I understood actually bought the Kirtland Temple but the US government said to give it to the RLDS because they were Joseph’s true successors. Then they went to take the Hendrickite’s lot by the same law, only to have the Latter-day Saints use evidence of polygamy to change the government’s mind.
    Then people are getting all angry about Latter-day Saints calling it a miracle (I’m talking people from the great and spacious building, not CofC, that would be understandable). It totally is! The RLDS in the early 20th century decided to go eumenical (spelling?) and work with the Hendrickites, and the Hendrickites had this firm belief that this was the way the temple would be rebuilt. Thankfully (from my point of view) they split–but the Temple Lot folks started breaking ground anyway based on a proported vision just days before the Great Depression which made it financially impossible. They felt so sure that they had a miraculous command to rebuild but disagreed on just one point, and the schism was so huge that it never went through. The RLDS built their own temple that was more important than Kirtland and went through enough changes over the next century that they too moved in another direction. The biggest thing is that they made all of these property decisions at once instead of gradually. Had they saved the Kirtland Temple for last members would have realized what they were up to and demanded that they put it up to a public vote; due to the sentimentality it would have continued to have cost for the public to tour it. Everything related to regaining the land has worked out for the best, and that is a miracle going from the poor underdogs who couldn’t even help new converts settle out west to being wise stewards.
    I am unaware of any prophecies relating to Kirtland temple access though, people should stop saying that without evidence.

    Anyway–I agree to be sensitive, I don’t even recommend saying “Thanks for taking care of our property”–people have been doing that on CofC’s facebook page and it’s been making some of them mad. Imagine if a breakoff sect got a hold of the Salt Lake Temple and said that as we were falling apart? Perhaps “Wow, you’re really fortunate to find buyers when so many similar churches can’t do the same, I look forward to sharing the message of the restoration together,” might be a better consolation?

  2. To help clarify I comment above, Strang certainly attracted many followers, but the apostolic succession of Brigham Young attracted 4-5X as many.

  3. Mr. Smith – Thank you for your article. Your article came up under a Google search when I asked “Why is the Kirtland sale so hard and emotional for many in the Community of Christ?” I am an outsider, looking in. I came to Community of Christ Beyond the Walls Livestream Church on YouTube via their Centre Place historical lectures. I’ve attended Beyond the Walls, supported their ministry financially out of deep appreciation for their great historical lectures! I am not nor do I want to officially join CofC. I don’t know much about the ins and outs of Mormon history, and I tend to skip the Centre Place lectures that are focused on Mormonism because some of the history is just plain hard to hear. I still don’t totally get it (the outpouring of grief among CofC’ers re: Kirtland sale), other than these various locations/documents in Kirtland and Nauvoo are considered perhaps “sacred”(?) to the CofC because this was ultimately the birthplace of the CofC, as well as religiously, Jesus and other prophets allegedly appeared or visited the Kirtland location? Am I right or is there more to it? Today, the great minister at Beyond the Walls was in an obvious state of severe grief and distress. I came in late to Beyond the Walls, and I actually had no idea what was going on. It also seems like a lot of YouTubers are more saying what’s going on with Kirtland from the LDS-Utah perspective and at least right now there are fewer CofC voices explaining their views on Kirtland sale. I just want to understand. If you can shed any light on this, please help me understand.

  4. Are we ignoring the fact that in the 1950s, the Kirkland temple was used to store livestock?

  5. Hi Timothy, thanks for that question about the importance of these sites to both Community of Christ and to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. For both faiths, this was the first temple—or holy place—built by Joseph Smith and the Saints in his day. In this temple were marvelous manifestations of the Holy Spirit and the beginning of the importance of temples for both churches. Because of these historically important events, the Kirtland Temple is considered sacred space by both churches. From the perspective of Community of Christ, losing ownership of this sacred space could be likened to the Jews losing ownership of the Western Wall, or Muslims ownership of the Kaaba. From the perspective of The Church of Jesus Christ, receiving ownership of this sacred space could be likened to the Jews gaining ownership of the Western Wall, or Muslims ownership of the Kaaba.

    As for more people on YouTube commenting on this from the perspective of The Church of Jesus Christ, that is simply a function of size of membership. Community of Christ has a reported membership of 250 thousand worldwide, whereas The Church of Jesus Christ has a reported membership of 17 million worldwide, so there are simply more people interested in this issue from the perspective of The Church of Jesus Christ.

    For more details on the importance of this site to both churches, I recommend:
    –David J. Howlett, Kirtland Temple: The Biography of a Shared Mormon Sacred Space (published 2014)
    –A Prophet and a Temple in Kirtland, Ohio: Through the Eyes of Eliza R. Snow and Lorenzo Snow, at https://history.churchofjesuschrist.org/landing/historic-sites/ohio/a-prophet-and-a-temple-in-kirtland
    –Kirtland Temple: History, at https://www.kirtlandtemple.org/history

  6. Sister MMT
    Note that the majority of the Saints did follow Brigham Young. The LDS Church is very grateful to be able to care for and preserve these properties and artifacts fir the future, while helping the Community of Christ.

  7. As a member of the Community of Christ I found this article deeply sympathetic and kind. Thank you for your generosity of spirit. The path foe The Community of Christ is unclear as the demographic we appeal to as a religion is a small one. That being said the I appreciate more than ever before having a tie to the LDS church as we can transfer these precious historical sites into the hands of welcoming care givers rather than into the hands of careless corporations.

Comments are closed.