April 9, 2026

3 thoughts on “Book Review: The Joseph Smith Papers Documents, Volume 12: March-July 1843

  1. Do we know why the JSPP people used the Wayment-Wilson-Lemmon theories regarding the Clark commentary if this volume you have just reviewed was still being prepared after their theories were shown by Jackson to be bogus?

  2. That’s a great question, Dennis. I’m thinking perhaps the footnotes were already done before people had a chance to thoroughly consider Jackson’s paper?

    It is interesting to note that the Church History Topic on the Joseph Smith Translation used to say “As he worked on these changes, he appears in many instances to have consulted respected commentaries by biblical scholars, studying them out in his mind as a part of the revelatory process.” ( https://web.archive.org/web/20201111222633/https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/history/topics/joseph-smith-translation-of-the-bible?lang=eng ) The current version of the essay does not include this sentence. ( https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/history/topics/joseph-smith-translation-of-the-bible?lang=eng)

  3. > I’m thinking perhaps the footnotes were already done before people had a chance to thoroughly consider Jackson’s paper?

    Just to update this, it has been confirmed that such is the case.

Comments are closed.